“Epidemiologists Explain Pellagra: Gender, Race, and Political Economy in the Work of Edgar
Sydenstricker” by Harry M. Marks, copyright 2003 Oxford University Press
Between 1900 and 1940, at least 100,000 individuals in the southern United States died of pellagra,
a dietary deficiency disease. Although half of these pellagra victims were
African-American and
more than two-thirds were women, contemporary observers paid little attention to these gender and racial
differences in
their analyses of disease. This article reviews the classic epidemiological studies of Joseph
Goldberger and Edgar Sydenstricker, who argued that pellagra was deeply rooted
in the political economy of cotton monoculture in the South.
In 1920, U.S.
Public Health Service (PHS) researchers Joseph Goldberger and Edgar
Sydenstricker reported on their ongoing study of pellagra in South Carolina
cotton mill villages.1 The study confirmed
their previous contention that pellagra was a dietary deficiency
disease whose underlying causes were rooted in the economic conditions of the
southern United States. Not only was pellagra incidence highest in the lowest
income groups, but also it was greatest in districts devoted to “King Cotton,” where monoculture and sharecropping were a
way of life.2
The U.S. Bureau of the
Census annual mortality reports indicated that African-Americans, despite their lesser numbers,
accounted for half of all
pellagra deaths, and that women of all colors accounted for 69 percent of all such deaths
(Fig. ).4
No comments:
Post a Comment