Monday, July 20, 2026

Jury Still Out in Nellie Freeman's Trial, July 20, 1926

Freeman Jury Not Able to Agree on Verdict by Noon. . . Sent Word to Judge Schenck at 10 a.m. that They Were Deadlocked as the Night Before. . . Rumors About Verdict Heard. . . One Such Report Is That 10 Jurors want Acquittal While Two Want Manslaughter Verdict

Charlotte, July 20 (AP)—The jury in the case of Mrs. Nellie Freeman, “razor girl,” who slew her husband Alton Freeman on the night of May 22, was deadlocked today after a night of deliberation.

Judge Michael Schenck who delivered a charge of an hour and 30 minutes to the jury, has not indicated this morning what time he expected a report from that body as to their progress.

The jury sent word to Judge Schenck at 10 o’clock this morning that there was no prospect of an early agreement and requested permission to continue their deliberations at the hotel. The Judge instructed Sheriff Cochran to permit the jurors to remain there until after lunch, if no verdict had been reached.

A report gained wide currency at the hotel and court house that 10 jurors stood for acquittal and two for manslaughter verdicts.

Early today the crowd had already assembled in the court room to wait the decision.

-=-

No sign of agreement was apparent this afternoon in the case of Nellie Freeman, charged with the murder of her husband.

From the front page of The Concord Daily Tribune, Tuesday, July 20, 1926

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn92073201/1926-07-20/ed-1/seq-1/

Defense Presents More Character Witnesses, July 20, 1926

More Character Witnesses for Cranford Heard. . . All of Them Testified to the Good Character of Man Charged with Murder of Two Negroes. . . State Offered Much Evidence. . . Is Indicated that Defense Will Consume Many Days with Evidence—Cranford to Testify

Albemarle, July 20 (AP)—Several additional character witnesses were placed on the stand this morning at the opening of court and testified to the good character of Nevin C. Cranford, on trial for the alleged murder in connection with the deaths of two convicts.

No indications as to when the defendant will take the stand were made.

O.C. Bruton of Mt. Gilead told the jury that Sam Thompson, prisoner, denied tales of harsh treatment at the hands of Cranford in conversation with him.

Thompson has testified that he was beaten by Cranford.

Vic L. Shankle of Mt. Gilead, a contractor, testified that Thompson told him he had received better treatment than he expected, and that Cranford never struck him.

From the front page of The Concord Daily Tribune, Tuesday, July 20, 1926

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn92073201/1926-07-20/ed-1/seq-1/

Was He a Man of Good Character or an Abusive Chain Gang Boss? July 19, 1926

Witnesses Tell About Cruelties

Albemarle July 19 (AP)—After introducing about a dozen witnesses this morning, all of whom told officers stories regarding cruelties on the part of N.C. Cranford, on trial here for the murder of two convicts on the 5th of August, 1918, the State rested its case at 2:55 o’clock this afternoon.

The defense at once went to the bat. The first witness was Ex-Sheriff G.D. Blalock of Norwood. The defense proposed to use the ex-sheriff as a character witness for Cranford. The State objected, and some time was taken up in argument as to the legality of evidence as to Cranford’s character, until he should be placed on the witness stand. Judge Finley ruled that since Cranford’s character had been attacked during the trial, in the manner in which it has, he should have a right to offer evidence directly in behalf of his character. Most of the witnesses, a dozen or more, offered by the defendant, were men who testified to the good character of the defendant. A large number of the leading men of the town and county went on the witness stand and testified that the character of the chain gang boss was good.

Among the last witnesses offered by the defendant this afternoon was Dr. C.I. Miller, an Albemarle dentist, who testified to the good character of Cranford and also testified that the teeth alleged to have been found in a lonely grave where a convict said that he and Cranford buried Quincy Leake, a convict, were, in his opinion, dog teeth. He stated that he was satisfied they were not human teeth, that he could determine, even though the teeth were in somewhat of a decayed condition.

From the front page of The Concord Daily Tribune, Tuesday, July 20, 1926

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn92073201/1926-07-20/ed-1/seq-1/

Fifth Brother Electrocuted Installing High-Voltage Lines in Asheville Area, July 20, 1926

Fifth Brother to Die by Electricity

Canton, July 19—Charles Haroldson of Darlington, S.C., was almost instantly killed early this afternoon when he attempted to open a switch at the top of a pole carrying a 4,400-volt wire and a few seconds later fell from the pole, striking his head on the pavement.

He is the fifth brother to be killed by electricity and is the third victim of the high voltage wires since the Phoenix Public Utilities Company has been engaged in installations in Asheville and vicinity during the last few months.

From page 3 of The Concord Daily Tribune, Tuesday, July 20, 1926

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn92073201/1926-07-20/ed-1/seq-3/

Lee Bumgardner, 14, Died Trying to Save Friend from Drowning, July 19, 1926

Youth Drowns Trying to Save His Friend. . . Lee Bumgardner, 14, Drowns in Catawba River Trying to Rescue Allen Campbell

Charlotte, July 19—Lee Bumgardner, 14, lost his life apparently in an ineffectual attempt to save his companion, Allen Campbell, 16, from drowning in the Catawba River near here today. Both youths lived at Mooresville.

The fathers of the boys went up the river to fish and when they returned their sons had disappeared. After several hours had been spent in diving into the river the bodies were located.

Finger impressions were found on Campbell’s throat, and it was thought that Bumgardner attempted to save his companion from drowning and lost his own life as a result.

From the front page of The Concord Daily Tribune, Tuesday, July 20, 1926

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn92073201/1926-07-20/ed-1/seq-1/

D.E. Merritt's Free Cemetery for County Citizens, June 10, 1914

“$500,000 Farm Left for Free Cemetery” in the June 10, 1914, issue of The Sun

D.E. Merritt’s Will Gives Burying Ground to Westchester County…Made Recluse by Love…160 Acre Place Near the Homes of Mrs. Reid and Other New Yorkers

White Plains, N.Y., June 5—One hundred sixty acres of the choicest land in Westchester county has been set apart for a free public cemetery in the will of Daniel E. Merritt, one of the original settlers of this town, which was filed for probate here to-day. The land, worth more than $500,000, is near the home of Mrs. Whitelaw Reid and other well known New Yorkers, and a strong protest against the establishment of a burying ground is expected from them.

To make sure that his purpose shall not be interfered with Mr. Merritt provides that his executors John S. Lyon Sr. and John S. Lyon Jr. of Port Chester, shall have an enabling act passed by the Legislature if the cemetery cannot legally be located under present law upon the farm where he lived for more than 70 years.

Back of the unusual will of the aged farmer lies the story of a man who early in life fell deeply in love with a woman who refused his suit. He then retired from the world and lived as a hermit for 50 years, allowing his hair to grow long about his shoulders and associating with no human beings save a few farm hands and his sister, now 72 years old, who has been incompetent mentally since she was 20.

Friends Kept His Secret

The identity of the woman who played such a tragic part in Daniel Merritt’s life is known to only a few persons alive to-day, and they are still bound by the secrecy he imposed upon them long ago. John S. Lyon Sr., a friend of Mr. Merritt for many years, refused to-night to throw light upon the mystery and said that he had known little of the recluse’s way of living in recent years.

When Merritt inherited the farm from his father, who had it from his father, it was not of great value. When the tide of development set in to the north and New Yorkers began to lay out great estates in that territory it became apparent that the Merritt place was worth a fortune. The owner, however, refused to sell and to the last day of his life kept the farm in the condition in which he found it.

He raised the usual crops and sold the surplus in the New York markets, as his ancestors had done before him, refusing all offers to sell his land. He had investments in stocks and bonds too and was independent of real estate agents.

His will provides that the farm shall be kept going as heretofore and his incompetent sister, Emma, permitted to live in the big Colonial Merritt home, under the care of the nurse who has had charge of her for many years. The retention of all the farm hands is provided for, and then comes the unusual clause establishing the cemetery upon the death of the sister.

Burials Without Cost

All of the citizens of Port Chester are to be buried free of charge in the Merritt Public Cemetery, to be laid out according to the ideas of the testator as expressed in his will. The institution is to be in charge of a board of trustees made up of the president of the village and the pastors of all the churches in Port Chester. The details are to be arranged by the trustees. The income and residue of the property, amounting to several hundred thousand dollars, will be used for the maintenance of the cemetery.

Mr. Merritt died on May 22. His sister is now the last of one of the oldest families in Westchester county, so no contest of the will is expected. Besides the provisions ofr the sister and for the establishment of the cemetery the only bequest was an annuity of $600 to “Laura Pierce, now married and living in King street, whose married name is unknown to me.”

The will was drawn by Congressman Ben Taylor on Oct.ber 16, 1913. The estate is estimated at $500,000 but friends of Mr. Merritt say that it will assess at more than twice that amount and that in addition valuable securities will be found when an inventory of the personal estate is made.

The cemetery was never established. The case was taken to the state Supreme Court, Appellate Division, which ruled June 23, 1916, that Merritt didn’t actually own all of the land, that he didn’t have sufficient funds to support such a cemetery, that he only left $12,000. Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the surrogates’ courts, Vol. 17: “With the income they can buy burial privileges in some cemetery, but they cannot maintain a public cemetery. The money cannot be regarded as a free public burial fund for all the people of Port Chester.” “…the general purpose was to make his sister’s farm the essential element of his scheme for a public cemetery and to support it largely with her money. There is a fragment of property left. It cannot be used to ‘accomplish the general purpose of the instrument.’ At this time whatever could be done would not be done even a semblance of the testator’s proposal. But the decision would not be premature. It is not for the surrogate or this court to decide whether the Supreme Court will execute the trust in some degree. The final direction rests with the Supreme Court upon the application of the charity trustees. That can be done when the life estates expire. Circumstances may change. The incompetence may be restored and elect to make under her brothers’ will. Then the testator’s plan could be executed. Meantime, the committee should not accept the provision made for her under the will. She cannot accept its benefits and reject it otherwise, and they should not elect for her.

Sunday, July 19, 2026

Gold Hill Mine's History, June 15, 1914

June 15, 1914: North Carolina Good Mine Exploited on U.S. Senate Paper; Senators Chilton and Overman Among the Stockholders…Committee Letterheads Used in Promoting $5,000,000 Gold Hill Property…Federal Assayist is Used as Investigator…J. Skelton Williams Cited as Friend of Promoter Walter G. Newman…Latter Has the Entrees at Capitol Offices…He is President of Company Whose Stock Sells at 50 Cents—Its Par is $5

Washington, June 14—If you happen to have received a communication on the official letter paper of the Senate Committee on Census, William E. Chilton of West Virginia, chairman, painting the rosy prospects of a North Carolina gold mine, it is due to a mistake.

Further, if you have been favored with an identical communication on the official letterhead of the Senate Committee on Rules, Lee S. Overman of North Carolina, chairman, it also is the result of a mistake.

You can take the words of Senator Chilton and Senator Overman for that. While acknowledging an interest in the mining venture, both disclaim personal responsibility for the extraordinary use of the official stationery of the Senate committee. They say that their clerks were to blame.

But the appearance of these letters among curb brokers in New York had a somewhat spectacular character and in other quarters has brought to a definite foundation stories which have been circulated in Washington for some time that a section of the Senate and others in Democratic officialdom were in the throes of an incipient gold fever; that dreams were being dreamed of fabulous fortunes to be drawn from the bowels of a North Carolina mountain; that senators were letting their friends in on the good thing; that clerks and pages who were fortunate enough to get an inkling of this short cut to “easy street” were withdrawing their money from the banks to buy stock, and that all were basking in the sunshine radiated by one Walter George Newman, a promoter, who has had something of a record in mining ventures.

J. Skelton Williams’s Part

In this Democratic gold movement John Skelton Williams, Comptroller of the currency, has played a humble part.

Mr. Newman says Comptroller Williams is a warm friend of his, having gone to school with him, and Newman has been a frequent visitor at the comptroller’s office. That, however, is an unimportant detail. A more interesting fact is that Mr. Williams, when he was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, had the chief expert of the United States Assay Office go to North Carolina at the Government’s expense and investigate the Newman gold mine.

Some of the Democratic Senators availed themselves of the results of that visit, but it should be said that the report made by the experts, though not entirely unfavorable, was hardly as rosy as the representations that had been made.

Officials of the Treasury Department say it is very unusual, but not irregular, for the Government to send a man out at its expense to investigate a privately owned gold mine. Mr. Williams says he was moved to send the expert solely because the question of the reopening of the United States assay office at Charlotte, N.C., had come up and he desired to ascertain whether or not there had been any development in gold production there that would require such an important step. The report of the expert, in Mr. Williams’s opinion, did not justify such a move by the Government.

Senator Overman’s Activity

Senator Overman, as Treasury officials recall the incident, was the man at whose request the reopening of the assay office and the investigation of the mine were taken up. All these incidents would, of course, pass unnoticed were it not for the unfortunate double headed mistake, which has resulted in the sending out of the letters on the official stationery.

The mining property that has aroused so much Democratic enthusiasm is that of the Gold Hill Consolidated Company, whose mine is at Gold Hill, Rowan County, N.C. This company is the successor of the old Gold Hill Copper Company of lamented memory. The latter is described in the Copper Hand Book, a recognized authority on such matters, as a “notorious promotion that caught any Wall Street operators” but that is merely a matter of history.

A new company has been organized with Walter George Newman as president, and with an authorized capital of $5,000,000, par $5 a share. The letter sent out on the Senate committee’s stationery is signed by “J.C. Williams, economic and mining geologist.” Mr. Williams is not listed in the American Institute of Mining Engineers, so far as could be ascertained here.

As Mr. Newman, the promoter and owner of a majority interest in the property, understands it, Williams was sent down to Gold Hill at the instance of Senator Chilton. Thereafter the mining engineer wrote a letter to the Senator, which has been reproduced by mistake on the official stationery of the two Senate committees and fallen into the hands of stock brokers.

Letter to the Senator

The letter to Senator Chilton reads, “Dear Sir: After spending some 30 days on the Gold Hill property and feeling you may be interested in what I may know and believing about the property, I write you this condensed information.

I have gone over the property of the Gold Hill Consolidated Company very carefully, both on the surface and through the mine down to the 800 foot level. After examining seven veins from 2 feet 6 inches to 12 feet in width, sampling and assaying them, I must say I see greater possibilities in the Gold Hill property every day.

My first opinion is fully confirmed and the veins will go to much greater depth than the 800 foot level and carry high values in gold, silver and copper. The copper veins alone will pay all expenses and show a handsome dividend, leaving the gold and silver clear.

After comparing the Gold Hill property with other mines and mining properties which I have examined in both the United States and Canada, on which valuations have been fixed, I would say I believe that $60,000,000 valuation on the Gold Hill property a conservative estimate. Yours very truly, J.C. Williams, Economic and Mining Geologist

Just now this letter has been reproduced on the official paper of the Senate committees is shown by photographs of the documents themselves. Each is plainly marked “copy” and both Senator Chilton and Senator Overman believe that that fact alone is sufficient to indicate that the committees as such and the other individuals whose names appear on the letterheads had nothing to do with the mining project.

Some Senators Hot

Some of the Senators whose names appear on the papers take a different view and are inclined to be hot over it. For instance, in the upper left hand corner of the Census Committee’s letterhead is the name of Robert M. LaFollette, also that of Senator Albert B. Cummins of Iowa, who has some decided views n the question of Government supervision of the issuance of the stocks and bonds.

Mr. Cummings has been favored beyond any other Senator through the mistake made in the offices of Senators Chilton and Overman. His name appears on both letterheads, as he is a member of the Committee on Rules as well as the Committee on Census. He had never heard of the Gold Hill Consolidated Company until he saw his name on one of the letterheads bearing the engineer’s report.

Other Senators whose names appear on the official paper of the Census Committee are Henry A. DuPont of Delaware, George P. McLean of Connecticut, Charles E. Townsend of Michigan, Republicans, and Atlee Pomerene of Ohio, Morris Sheppard of Texas, Benjamine F. Shively of Indiana, John R. Thornton of Louisiana, James E. Martine of New Jersey and William H. Thompson of Kansas, Democrats, and Henry Fry, clerk of the committee.

….

Mine With a Long History

The Gold Hill, North Carolina, mine is one with a long history. Before the civil war, it is said, several millions of dollars were taken from it. Like most North Carolina mining ventures, however, it has had a checkered career. The Copper Handbook describes it as the largest gold producer in 1845 in the United States. The Copper Handbook adds:

“The mine was operating in 1913, crosscutting on the 270 foot level to cut the Newman vein already opened on the 800 foot level. Shipments to the Perth Amboy smelter returned 1.5 per cent. copper and about $3 gold per ton, with small silver values.”

For a considerable period, the mine was involved in litigation and at one time was flooded. Newman contends that after pumping it out and cross-cutting it he made discoveries which warrant his present rosy representation. He asserts, also, that he has added materially to the plant recently.

Newman himself is president and the directors as given in the 1913 reference books were Edward H. Swan, William P. Woodbury, Woodruf Leeming, Charles F. Stacy, J.C. Kemp and W.F. Lanigan.

Walter George Newman, president of the Gold Hill Consolidated Company, has had a spectacular career. From a sailor before the mast, he became captain of a vessel, travelled around the world and then, coming to New York, became a clerk in the office of Roswell P. Flower.

It is said that his first tip came from Gov. Flower and that he netted $15,000. He was soon worth a fortune. He has won and lost several fortunes in the Street.

Sometimes he calls himself Baron Newman. Three years ago, when Sig. H Rosenblatt & Co., Brokers, failed disastrously, Newman was wanted as a witness in the bankruptcy hearings. Rosenblatt, the Stock Exchange member of the failed firm, had been suspended as a result of the bankruptcy.

Process servers kept watch on Newman’s office at 1 Wall street for weeks and finally learned that Newman was in Hoboken. Newman was discovered as Baron Jones in a hotel there. He was served with a subpoena but failed to appear at the hearing.

A year later Newman was arrested for contempt in having failed to obey the subpoena. He was committed to Ludlow street jail, but he didn’t stay there long.

According to the attorney for the failed firm, Newman had sold to Rosenblatt much stock in the Union Copper Mines Company, and the firm failed because the stock was not marketable.

Newman’s adventures outside of Wall Street have attracted much attention from the newspapers. Ten years ago, he had two women arrested on Fifth avenue charging that they tried to steal his $1,000 watch. In making the complaint he gave the name of his private secretary, but the next morning he said he had done this to avoid publicity.

Back in 1910 he appeared in Roanoke, Va., according to newspaper clippings with a disabled automobile. He offered $1,000 for a new cuss word which would fully express his feelings to the automobile. He dressed up a negro valet as a minstrel man and used him as a trumpeter on the automobile, instead of using a horn. Newman insisted on paying double rates at the hotel.

A short time later Alexander Low, a curb broker, sued him for $1,052 for services. Low got judgment by default and the execution was returned unsatisfied. Low’s attorneys obtained an order for Newman’s examination in supplementary proceedings. Newman appeared for examination, waited for a while and then jumped to his feet.

“Say,” he exclaimed angrily, “I can’t wait here all day. Good-by.”

And he rushed from the room.

His first wife was Miss Leila Moore, a cousin. In 1905 she sued for divorce, and after she won her suit she was married to a man who had been Newman’s stable boy. Newman married again.

-=-

d Hill Consolidated Soared and Then Tumbled

The letters on Senator Childton’s committee papers began to appear among the curb brokers early last week, and it was not long before a score of brokers had them.

It is hard to say just how the letters appeared, but if a man wanted one all he had to do was to apply at the office of the Gold Hill Consolidated Company, 30 Broad street, and a copy of the letter, on the same paper, would be handed to him. At least one office boy applied for and received a copy of the letter.

Gold Hill Consolidated has had almost as many ups and downs as Walter George Newman, the company’s president. The company formerly was called the Gold Hill Copper Company, and although the stock had some market on the curb it was never a strong success for the investors.

Then about five years ago those in charge of the company’s affairs decided to reorganize it. The name was changed to Gold Hill Consolidated Company and the old stock was recalled. Receipts were given for the old stock on a basis of a receipt for 50 shares for a certificate of 100 shares.

Soon after the company had been changed, and while the former stockholders were in possession of their receipts, the new stock began to appear. The company was capitalized at $5,000,000, broken into 1,000,000 shares of $5 par.

A fine market was created for the new stock on the curb. At first those who sold it parted with it at about $2 a share, but the demand was soon so great apparently that they demanded more. The price soared and soared, until those who were in a position to sell were getting $7 a share for the stock.

But the stockholders in the old company with their receipts were unable to take advantage of the fine prices offered. They didn’t have the certificates to sell, and they couldn’t sell their receipts. Thousands of shares of stock changed hands and then the market price changed. It didn’t sag; it tumbled down from $7 until it was quoted at 10 cents a share.

When the price struck the bottom, the old stockholders got their nicely engraved certificates in exchange for the receipts that they held. This was last July, after these receipts had been out for four years.

The stock now sells occasionally for 50 cents a share.