Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Report from Leicester in The News-Record, June 26, 1925

From Leicester

Miss Hattie Roberts of Marshall, N.C., is spending the week end with Miss Pauline Duckett. Miss Roberts won high honors as a student in art at Anderson College, S.C., and at present is attending the Asheville summer school.

Mr. and Mrs. E.W. Bale and Mr. and Mrs. Hubert Miller made a motor trip to Old Fort last Sunday.

Mrs. Texie Rogers of Cullowhee was recently a guest of Mr. and Mrs. C.B. Hayes.

The friends of Mr. W.S. Martin, who formerly lived on the Marshall Road, will note with pleasure that he is recovering after an operation at the Merriweather Hospital on Wednesday night.

Mrs. W.E. Roberts, her son, Wade, and daughter, Alberta, spent last week end with friends at Blue Ridge.

Born to Mr. and Mrs. Herman Brown Saturday, June 13, 1925, a son.

Mr. Dan Foster has returned home after a year spent as a student at Chapel Hill and has accepted a position with the Carmichael Drug Co. of Asheville.

Several Leicester teachers are attending the Asheville summer school, among whom are Misses Hattie Mae and Mayme Garrett, Hattie, Hildreth and Ellen Jarvis, Mrs. J.C. Lunsford and Arnold Smith.

Mr. Norman Andrews of Charlotte was a guest Monday at the home of Mr. and Mrs. M.B. Reeves.

Miss Mae Sluder spent last Monday with friends at Mars Hill.

Mr. and Mrs. Herman Stevens recently visited Mr. Stevens’ parents, Rev. and Mrs. A.B. Dennis, at their home in King’s Mountain.

Miss Merkie Sluder spent last week with relatives in West Asheville.

Mr. Charles Pitts and Mr. Tony Davis made a hurried trip to Morristown, Tenn., last Sunday.

From page 2 of The News-Record, Marshall, N.C., June 26, 1925

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn92074087/1925-06-26/ed-1/seq-2/

Ballard-Waldrup Vows Exchanged June 21, 1925

Ballard-Waldrup

The many friends of Miss Emma Ballard and Mr. Troy Waldrup will be interested to know that they were married June 21st in Barnardsville. Miss Ballard had already accepted a position as teacher in the Leicester High School.

From page 2 of The News-Record, Marshall, N.C., June 26, 1925

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn92074087/1925-06-26/ed-1/seq-2/

Monday, June 23, 2025

Prison Guards Need to be Allowed to Flog, Shoot Inmates, Argues Editor, June 25, 1925

Some newspaper was lambasting the management of one of the prison camps because a guard shot two escaping prisoners. It does look hard for a prisoner to lose his life in an attempt to escape. Yet if those making the attempt are allowed to go unscathed because the guards cannot run them down and master them with their naked hands, it is evident that there would soon be no convicts to guard. If guards are not expected to shoot, they should not be allowed to have guns. The problem of managing convicts, we judge, is a more difficult one when it is viewed close up than it may appear from a distance. Judge Sinclair, for instance, announces that flogging in convict camps must cease. But what is the boss to do when a big burly fellow refuses absolutely to work?

From the editorial page of The Chatham Record, Pittsboro, N.C., Thursday, June 25, 1925

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn85042115/1925-06-25/ed-1/seq-4/

Judge Gives Permanent Receivership to Carolina Coal Company, June 25, 1925

Carolina Coal Mine Given Receivership. . . Judge Bryson Grants Permanent Receivership to Company Despite Attorneys’ Plea

Greensboro Daily News

Rockingham, June 18—On June 8 a temporary receivership for the Carolina Coal company was secured before Judge Daniels in Raleigh with J.H. Kennedy made temporary receiver. Judge Daniels set June 18th as time for having a hearing before Judge Bryson at Rockingham upon the question of making the receivership permanent. It was at the mines of this coal company that 53 men were killed several weeks ago in Chatham county. The petition for a receivership followed so that the company could keep the pumps working and eventually sell the mine and liquidate to its creditors.

Appearing before Judge Bryson here today for the coal company was D.B. Teague and for the receiver was A.A.F. Seawell, all of Sanford. Present also were J.R. McQueen and C.M. Reeves, of the mining company. At the conclusion of Attorney Seawell’s request that the temporary receivership be made permanent, Attorney K.R. Hoyle addressed the judge and asked that the receivership not be made permanent. E.L. Gavin also spoke against the receivership, these two lawyers then asked that an additional receiver be appointed.

Judge Bryson declined to do this and signed an order making the temporary receivership permanent and John H. Kennedy as sole receiver. It is understood that Mr. Hoyle stated after the hearing that he intends starting proceedings throwing the company into bankruptcy.

From the front page of The Chatham Record, Pittsboro, N.C., Thursday, June 25, 1925

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn85042115/1925-06-25/ed-1/seq-1/#words=June+22%2C+1925

Postal Carrier Mabry Accused of Misconduct, June 25, 1925

Post Office Reduces Rural Carrier on R-5. . . Charges Against Carrier Mabry by Patrons—May Take Fight to Washington

Certain patrons of route 5, leading out from Albemarle towards Rocky River Springs in a southerly direction, have preferred charges against the carrier, Mr. John Wesley Mabry.

These charges allege theft of 10 cents—paid by a patron to the carrier for a special delivery stamp; deviation from route; carelessness; and other items.

The post office department instituted its formal investigation, by correspondence and through inspector and recommendations of the postmaster. While the carrier answered the charges by letter, orders were given to the effect that Carrier Mabry was subject to dismissal or transfer. It is understood that Postmaster Almond made recommendations to the department of Mr. Mabry’s fitness and competency to render satisfactory service on any other route just as satisfactorily as either carrier in the service. Following the department’s order, Mabry is at present serving patrons on route 4, while the route 4 carrier is assigned to route 5.

This means that the murmur from patrons of route 5 against Mabry was given weight at Washington, and since the department seeks to give patrons of any route the kind of satisfaction they call for within the realms of postal service law, the change was effected.

But Mr. Mabry does not think he has been given a square deal. He was given only a very short notice, when in reality the notice was in hands of the postmaster several days before he (Mabry) was told that he was assigned to the other route. But for this, he claims, he could have gotten a hearing on the matter and probably have made his contentions fully understood by the department.

As to the charges, the carrier makes I plain that the charge of theft is absolutely false. The source from which it arises indicates that it relates to a parcel and a letter mailed about the time the country was making its draft upon young men for army service. A father mails a parcel to his son, who has been drafted, and requests that Mabry place a special delivery on it so that it would get to his son as quickly as possible. Mabry placed a special delivery stamp on the package, and mailed the letter without a special delivery stamp. The envelope to the letter was returned by the son to his father, who claims that the carrier pocketed the 10 cents, and did not apply it to the purchase of a delivery stamp. This occurred several years back, and has been threshed out under former investigations without prejudice to Mabry.

As to the deviation from route, Mabry was not conscious of violating the rules. There have been a number of changes on the route from time to time, and a quarrelsome set of patrons made it hard for the department, carrier, or postmaster to meet their demands. The routes are regularly inspected, and if deviations were being made wrongfully, the postmaster and their reports governing the route should have discovered the error. On this point there is yet some debate, since Mr. Elaus Efird’s home has been an established corner ever since the route was established, and through some hook or crook the orders relating to the route withdrew the service from that immediate location. Roads in that immediate section are very bad at best, and it is a matter just now of doubt as to whether the recent rulings meet the original intentions and plans formerly considered by the department.

As to being careless, Mr. Mabry has made his errors. And the same sort of errors are chargeable against practically every servant of the public from Uncle Sam’s mail table. Only carriers and mail clerks themselves know how easily these errors are made and how very ready a complaining patron is to make his complaint.

As to Wesley Mabry, he is honest, honorable, worthy, and energetic. When the call urged him to enter the ministry and while he was ready for that service, his brother Lee became a care upon him. this brother is bedridden for life. Cheerful boy, sunshiny in his disposition and with a heart to make everyone happy around him, it is not Lee’s fault that he demands the constant care of another. His big brother has assumed the task, and in a most unselfish way devotes his life to carrying the mail, keeping several acres of farm land under cultivation, doing the chores about the house, and besides this giving faithful service to his church as a steward and worker. Big hearted, unselfish Wesley Mabry is not the sort of man a sweet-spirited and pure minded person would seize upon as one who is guilty of theft, willful carelessness, or violation of rules.

Hence, one is led to look into the charges, and investigate as to those making them.

Some of the complaints were formerly served by another route. The department shifted them on to route 5 against their wishes. They came to route 5 fussing and they have been at it ever since. Some of them declined to put up boxes for the new service and the carrier and post office went to great trouble to appease their ruffled spirits. Postmasters shared in this umbrage, but the carrier has caught the biggest brunt of it all.

Among the complainants, it is known that there are those who have fought special taxes for schools, opposed consolidated schools, have fought good roads, and opposed progressive measures of any kind. One of them was heard to say he would give $100 if he could force Mabry to go back to work on the farm for his living. This in itself would not relieve Mabry if the charges against him were true, but no unprejudiced mind believes for a moment that any of the major allegations could be sustained against Mabry. In fact, he has a clear-cut cause for criminal action against some of the folks that have made the charges, and Mabry and his friends are not satisfied at letting the matter rest upon the actin of the department as at present.

Through the co-operation of Senator Overman, and if necessary, the civil service commission itself, Mr. Mabry will demand that a full and free airing of the charges against him be made, and that his accusers be brought face to face with him in clearing up the charges.

Why Mabry should be taken off one route and reduced in salary $600 to take a smaller route is the issue at stake.

From the front page of The Albemarle Press, “A Stanly County Weekly of Character—Published Every Thursday” June 25, 1925

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn91068199/1925-06-25/ed-1/seq-1/#words=June+21%2C+1925

Farmer's Family Suffers after Bringing Cow with TB Home, June 25, 1925

A Brief for Public Health

Moore County News

Not all public health work is graft, as a farmer living near Columbus, Ga., believed. That was 10 years ago. His especial contempt was reserved for tubercular inspection of cows, and when two of the herd of an adjacent dairy farm were branded as suspicious by the milk inspector, he purchased one of them. He didn’t believe there was any such thing as tuberculosis in cows.

That farmer lost his wife from tuberculosis; his son is permanently disabled from bone tuberculosis, and his two daughters are in a tuberculosis hospital.

Here’s his statement:

“In the fall of 1912 a dairy herd near me was tested for tuberculosis and two cows were put out of the dairy. One was killed as a reactor and one was called suspicious, and the suspicious cow was taken to my premises and milked. I felt that the office of milk inspector was a graft, to give some man an easy job, and did not believe that there was any such thing as tuberculosis in cows. This cow was fed just as those in the dairy was fed, and in one month she looked so bad that I was afraid to milk her. She was given ack to the man who formerly owned her. My son developed tuberculosis the next year and has had it until the present time, and my wife, I believe, contracted it form the boy. The boy was kept in the hospital at Decatur, Ga., for four years, and on his back for nine months, where part of the bone of the neck was removed and a part of the leg bone used to replace the neck bone. My two daughters are now in the tuberculosis hospital at Alto, Ga., and I believe that they contracted the disease from their mother, who was buried here today.”

And all this might have been avoided if the farmer had believed what the inspector of the state department of health told him about the dangers of tuberculosis in cattle.

From the front page of The Chatham Record, Pittsboro, N.C., Thursday, June 25, 1925

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn85042115/1925-06-25/ed-1/seq-1/#words=June+22%2C+1925

Dr. Shepherd, Dr. Bluford Promoted, June 25, 1925

Two of the state’s leading negro educators have received substantial promotion in the past two weeks. Dr. Shepherd’s school at Durham is being converted into a college of rank A, and he becomes the first president of the college. Dr. Bluford, for a number of years dean of the A. & T. College, Greensboro, and Dr. J.B. Dudley’s right-hand man, succeeds the scholarly and common-sense Dudley who died a few weeks ago as president of that important school.

From the editorial page of The Chatham Record, Pittsboro, N.C., Thursday, June 25, 1925

newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn85042115/1925-06-25/ed-1/seq-4/